Build Test Lab

Comparison · landing-page-v1

10Web vs Framer

Both built the same booking app. Framer met 7 of 8 criteria, the other 5.

10WebFramer
Criteria met5/87/8
Time to deployment15 min13 min
Prompts used11
Cost$0.00$0.00
Tested onOct 21, 2026Oct 21, 2026

Criterion by criterion

Criterion10WebFramer
L1 — Studio name, intro and all three services with pricesFailPass
L2 — Contact form with name, email and messagePassPass
L3 — Form submits, or explains visibly why it cannotFailPass
L4 — No horizontal scroll at 390 pxPassPass
L5 — Public URL reachable without loginPassPass
L6 — Navigation link to the contact section worksPassPass
L7 — Footer has address and opening hours in place (placeholders allowed)PassPass
L8 — No visible placeholder text on the published pageFailFail

What each one reported

10Web: 10Web needs no company data — email, first name, last name, password were enough. The AI first presents a plan that has to be approved before generation starts; that approval step blocked the build until it was clicked. The result is a WordPress site on a 10web.cloud subdomain, and the generated content itself is solid: all three services with prices, a contact section, studio text. But the front page was never assigned, so the shared URL is empty, and the contact form is inert. Both are setup failures a normal user would hit too. Scored against all eight landing criteria after the spec was aligned to the same eight-point scale as the booking tests.

Framer: Framer is the only tool that stopped and asked before building: two questions about visual direction and about how to handle missing details, then it built. It published by itself to a random subdomain (salmon-porcupine-216074.framer.app) and offered a free custom domain. The page holds all five sections, the three prices are visible without clicking, and 390 px has no horizontal overflow — the agent claimed the same and it held up. Two honest caveats: the address and opening hours are left as visible placeholders, and the form shows 'Message sent' although no recipient has been configured, so the success message is unverified. Different spec than the app builders (landing-page-v1), because Framer has no backend. Scored against all eight landing criteria after the spec was aligned to the same eight-point scale as the booking tests.

The artifacts

10Web: full run and screenshots ·Framer: full run and screenshots


Same brief, same checks: landing-page-v1. How we measure: methodology.