Build Test Lab
← All landing-page-v1 runs

landing-page-v1 · run Oct 21, 2026

10Web: 5/8 criteria met

We built the same booking app in 10Web that we build in every other builder. Tested Oct 21, 2026 against landing-page-v1.

Criteria met5 of 8
Time to a working deployment15 minutes
Prompts used1
Cost$0.00 (free trial; no per-build credits shown)
Tested onOct 21, 2026

What passed

CriterionResult
L1 — Studio name, intro and all three services with pricesFail
L2 — Contact form with name, email and messagePass
L3 — Form submits, or explains visibly why it cannotFail
L4 — No horizontal scroll at 390 pxPass
L5 — Public URL reachable without loginPass
L6 — Navigation link to the contact section worksPass
L7 — Footer has address and opening hours in place (placeholders allowed)Pass
L8 — No visible placeholder text on the published pageFail

What broke

Artifacts

Notes

10Web needs no company data — email, first name, last name, password were enough. The AI first presents a plan that has to be approved before generation starts; that approval step blocked the build until it was clicked. The result is a WordPress site on a 10web.cloud subdomain, and the generated content itself is solid: all three services with prices, a contact section, studio text. But the front page was never assigned, so the shared URL is empty, and the contact form is inert. Both are setup failures a normal user would hit too. Scored against all eight landing criteria after the spec was aligned to the same eight-point scale as the booking tests.

Related answers


How we test and what we do not measure: methodology. Every builder against this brief: landing-page-v1.

Head to head: 10Web vs Durable · 10Web vs Framer