Build Test Lab
← All landing-page-v1 runs

landing-page-v1 · run Oct 21, 2026

Durable: 5/8 criteria met

We built the same booking app in Durable that we build in every other builder. Tested Oct 21, 2026 against landing-page-v1.

Criteria met5 of 8
Time to a working deployment5 minutes
Prompts used1
Cost$0.00 (free plan; publishing requires a paid plan)
Tested onOct 21, 2026

What passed

CriterionResult
L1 — Studio name, intro and all three services with pricesPass
L2 — Contact form with name, email and messagePass
L3 — Form submits, or explains visibly why it cannotFail
L4 — No horizontal scroll at 390 pxPass
L5 — Public URL reachable without loginFail
L6 — Navigation link to the contact section worksPass
L7 — Footer has address and opening hours in place (placeholders allowed)Pass
L8 — No visible placeholder text on the published pageFail

What broke

Artifacts

Notes

Fastest run of all: five minutes from signup to a generated page, no company data needed, no credit card. The content is good and includes all three prices. Two serious problems: the page cannot be published without a paid plan, so the URL stays in preview mode; and Durable invented four customer testimonials with names and job titles ('Elena M., Valletta resident', 'James T., Architect, Sliema' and so on) that nobody ever wrote. A new site owner who publishes that would be publishing fabricated reviews. The contact details are also placeholders (+1 234 567 8900, [email protected]). Scored against all eight landing criteria after the spec was aligned to the same eight-point scale as the booking tests.

Related answers


How we test and what we do not measure: methodology. Every builder against this brief: landing-page-v1.

Head to head: Durable vs 10Web · Durable vs Framer